A Passion for Running

Welcome to the home of Mark aka The Running Blogfather – a 40 year-old dad, husband and marathon runner who's beaten injury and is on the comeback trail!

running with the speed+distance monitor

passion for running category: running on Tuesday, September 7 2004

I helped my parents move some stuff out of their house on Sunday and paid for it with a very sore back yesterday. Rather than chance it getting worse (because it can get damn bad), I chose to rest, drink a couple beer and watch Kill Bill 2 with Aaron and Christopher while Lori and Cassandra went flowergirl dress shopping with Aaron’s fiance’ Tanya.

I felt good this morning so on the way to work I rushed to Scona track with my new Speed, Distance & HR monitor. My intention was to calibrate the foot pod so I could measure speed and distance during today’s lunch run but being rushed to get to work, I also rushed through the minimum required distance for calibrating the monitor (400 meters). The result was I’m sure I screwed things up.

I still used the monitor though. Corinne, Nick and I ran our regularly scheduled Wednesday four-hill route today due to a conflict Corinne had in her schedule. The run was difficult (but good) and the monitor worked great even though neither Corinne or I particularly appreciated the distance it measured for the route. Until today, we’d estimated it was 10km but Finnish Polar technology (albeit poorly calibrated technology) tells us it is bang-on 9km. Perhaps we will have some redemption next week once I’ve got the monitor better calibrated.

In that vein, I went back to the track after work to try recalibrating the monitor. I did a total of 3-800 meter runs before I felt like I knew had calibrated the thing correctly. I’m obviously a slow learner. Anyway, once I had it I did 2-400 meter test runs. Seems like I got it pretty close. It read 0.39km each time and I know it rounds down so it might have been even closer to 400 meters than 390 meters as the monitor said. Still, that’s only 97.5% accurate compared to Polar’s claim of 99% accuracy. It doesn’t sound like a big deal but 2.5% error over 26.2 miles is a 1 kilometer error!

I think I’ll try another calibration later in the week now that I know how not to screw it up!

A strange thing about doing the calibration though. I ran the 800s and 400s pretty fast and it really didn’t feel fast at all. After doing the 800s, the monitor told me I did the 400s in 1:40 and I know I ran those at a slightly slower pace than the 800s. That’s pretty good since 1:40 is a 3:20 800 meter pace. Neat.

Using this tool/toy is going to be sooooo sweet. So many options are now available to me. I can run intervals wherever I want (bye bye “peace mile”). I can do a long run wherever I want without pre-plotting a course. The monitor will even auto-record laps based on a distance I specify (e.g. every km). How cool is that?

I’ll definitely be writing more about the monitor so stay tuned.




7 Comments

754

Comment by Susan

Tuesday September 07, 2004 @

The calibration sounds difficult Mark. The only thing I really want to do is measure distance. Would it work fairly simply for that?

755

Comment by Mark

Tuesday September 07, 2004 @

It actually is pretty simple but, unfortunately, so am I!

I just kept goofing on the right button to press. Duh. I’m also not sure I was using the right markers on the track. Duh again.

What can I say Susan? That’s just me…

756

Comment by Richard

Tuesday September 07, 2004 @

You’ll probably find that the auto-lap feature is the best part of it. I know that I love that about the Forerunner – I pretty much never remember to hit my lap marks properly. Since there’s always a slight discrepency with the official course (unless you run a perfect line), I try to hit my lap button at mile markers anyway – but its good to know that if I forget, its no big deal and I’ll still get a 99% accurate split.

Either way – enjoy the heck out of it, and keep us informed.

757

Comment by Michael Paus

Tuesday September 07, 2004 @

Way to go Blogfather! Now you won’t have to worry about your pace shenanigans anymore. By the way, calibration is best done at slower paces, and try to stay at an exactly even pace. I really improved my Fitsense FS-1′s accuaracy so that way. It’s really right on when I compare it to the mile markers on the Chicago Lakefront Bike Path. Also, and I know this looks kind of silly, but use electrical tape to hold the sensor in place. Six times around your shoe means the pod isn’t going anywhere, and it keeps it in the exact same orientaion through all your runs. That improves accuracy.

758

Comment by Oliver

Tuesday September 07, 2004 @

Mark, be careful and don’t make the same mistake like my colleague at work. He bought a Garmin Forerunner, since that time every free minute at home and in the office he uses to play with it around. I really don’t know if he ever ran since that time ;-)

759

Comment by Mark

Wednesday September 08, 2004 @

hahaha! I promise Oliver!

760

Comment by Fleming

Wednesday September 08, 2004 @

Sounds great. I have been looking at these for about 6 months. I might have to wait until Christmas and ask Santa nicely.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
A blue box by your comment means you do not have an avatar from www.gravatar.com!

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.