Age & Weight Grading Calculator Analyzes Race Success
June 26, 2007 | Tags: age-grading • calculators • Motivation • pr • tools • Weight Loss
There was a three and a half year gap between my previous and new PR marathons.
I had made a number of changes in how I trained for the latter marathon. I could chalk the PR up solely due to those changes, but I also must recognize that I’m seven pounds lighter now.
Naturally, I’ve been wondering how much of my success was due to carrying seven less pounds versus being better trained. I knew they were both factors, but I didn’t know exactly how much of a role each played.
And then there was the question of age-grading - I was three and a half years younger in 2003.
In timely fashion, this month’s Runner’s World had an article in it called What’s Your Ideal Weight. The article had a link to an age and weight grading calculator - a tool that allows you to analyze your successes by comparing race times with a calculation involving your age and weight when you ran those races.
So I compared my 2003 PR:
Age: 36
Weight: 167
Marathon Finish Time: 3:43:53
with my 2007 PR:
Age: 39 (actually, I was one month shy of the big 4-0)
Weight: 160
Marathon Finish Time: 3:38:28
And here is what the Flyer Handicap Calculator had to say about those stats:
- My 2003 result would have equaled a 3:18 marathon at the age of 25.
- My 2007 result would have equaled a 3:13 marathon at the age of 25
What this means is that with weight and age factored out of the equation, my training is responsible for a very substantial improvement - just the kind of news I wanted to hear.
And that’s not taking into account the differences between 2003 and 2007 race course difficulty. The 2007 course was much more difficult than the 2003 PR course. I estimate I would have run this latest marathon at sub 3:30 if I had run it on the 2003 course.
And how would the picture have looked if I had run it in 3:30? It would have equated to a 3:07 marathon at age 25. Cool.
The Flyer Handicap Calculator is a terrific tool. It’s provided me with objective evidence that my training has been immensely successful.
Give it a try and tell us your stories!





Wow. My Marathon time would have been 45 minutes faster if I were 5 years younger and a lot lighter.
Mine would’ve been 8 seconds slower if I was older and fatter.
[…] few months ago, I posted an article about age and weight grading on CRN. Here’s an update on my PR age+weight grading history including the new Regina […]
perhaps you could help.
There 7 of us going to be running a half marathon in a few months time. We all range in age, fitness and weight. We were wondering if there is a handicapping system that would tell who should be how fast ahead or behind the next one in order to win (between the 7 of us)
Details:
Sex Age Weight Height
M 25 83kg 1.87m
M 31 93kg 1.79m
M 45 106kg 1.89m
M 47 104kg 1.90m
F 22 55kg 1.64m
F 38 65kg 1.60m
F 42 88kg 1.65m
Cleary the 47yr male should not expect to run it in the same time that the 25yr male would. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Kind regards
Leigh-Anne