<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Chemical Games</title> <atom:link href="http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/</link> <description>Runner's Information &#38; Advice</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:01:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: best pocket knife</title><link>http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/comment-page-1/#comment-174295</link> <dc:creator>best pocket knife</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:39:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/#comment-174295</guid> <description>Some good points there Donald</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good points there Donald</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dori</title><link>http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/comment-page-1/#comment-2707</link> <dc:creator>Dori</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 02:25:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/#comment-2707</guid> <description>Atomic weight? Covalent bonds? Bunsen Burners!!! Um...it sounds like somebody may have had too many chemicals in the 60s!
Funny article, but you made some good points.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atomic weight? Covalent bonds? Bunsen Burners!!! Um&#8230;it sounds like somebody may have had too many chemicals in the 60s!</p><p>Funny article, but you made some good points.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Iocchelli</title><link>http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/comment-page-1/#comment-2700</link> <dc:creator>Mark Iocchelli</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:14:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/#comment-2700</guid> <description>Nicely said, Donald.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely said, Donald.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DREW</title><link>http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/comment-page-1/#comment-2696</link> <dc:creator>DREW</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:01:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/#comment-2696</guid> <description>Donald, I learned much from your series when you originally posted it and this is a great synopsis of your thoughts on the matter.  We should continue to do everything we can to make it hard for athletes to cheat, but I understand that nothing we do will change the fact that many will continue to do so.  Sad, but true.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald, I learned much from your series when you originally posted it and this is a great synopsis of your thoughts on the matter.  We should continue to do everything we can to make it hard for athletes to cheat, but I understand that nothing we do will change the fact that many will continue to do so.  Sad, but true.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blaine Moore (Run to Win)</title><link>http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/comment-page-1/#comment-2688</link> <dc:creator>Blaine Moore (Run to Win)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:03:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://completerunning.com/archives/2006/08/28/chemical-games/#comment-2688</guid> <description>The other side of your chemists coin is that drugs alone are not enough to stand out.  Those athletes do in fact have to work for it.  They just get better rewards for their work than somebody doing it naturally.
I am all for getting rid of the drugs. If they want to make a chemical games and have it seperated, that&#039;s fine, as long as I can have drug free events to watch.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other side of your chemists coin is that drugs alone are not enough to stand out.  Those athletes do in fact have to work for it.  They just get better rewards for their work than somebody doing it naturally.</p><p>I am all for getting rid of the drugs. If they want to make a chemical games and have it seperated, that&#8217;s fine, as long as I can have drug free events to watch.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
